View Poll Results: ?

Voters
56. You may not vote on this poll
  • Good

    14 25.00%
  • Bad

    42 75.00%
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 14

Thread: The Golden Lands....Good or Bad for IPY?

  1. #1
    Banned
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Posts
    264

    The Golden Lands....Good or Bad for IPY?

    Since we're still in the "2.49999" to 2.5 transition...I reckon it's not too late?

  2. #2
    I think it will be extremely interesting at the very least. Az is banking heavily on this, this either succeeds or the shard dies....almost his words.

    I've never heard of anybody doing 2 separate rule sets on the same server with transition between each and separate items/skills. It will be a pretty interesting experiment to watch unfold, you have to admit. I don't understand why everyone is so against the idea. I hear all of this clamoring about "fix the small things" yet fixing small things never brings back more than 2 people at a time.

  3. #3
    Sounds interesting to me, I loved UOR pvp and mount pvp, also no statloss or paladins sounds fun.

  4. #4
    Banned
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Posts
    264
    I just don't see how it will work...You do realize that the people will flock to the side with the higher population, and the other facet will dwindle? Look at Trammel/Felucca situation....I think it would be 10x better if the Golden Lands and it's ruleset was in the Lost Lands of T2A, infact I would embrace it if it were there...

    Wish I could edit the poll -- what do you guys think about The Golden Lands being in the "Lost Lands" of T2A?
    Last edited by Dirt; July 20th, 2012 at 01:07 AM.

  5. #5
    Quote Originally Posted by Dirt View Post
    I just don't see how it will work...You do realize that the people will flock to the side with the higher population, and the other facet will dwindle? Look at Trammel/Felucca situation....I think it would be 10x better if the Golden Lands and it's ruleset was in the Forgotten Lands of T2A, infact I would embrace it if it were there...

    Wish I could edit the poll -- what do you guys think about The Golden Lands being T2A?
    Lolwut? This is a T2A era shard with some obvious changes (no mounts). How would you make the Golden Lands MORE T2A? Are you just asking that we simply add the land mass?

    The flocking to Trammel on OSI was 100% because of the safety of Trammel, I really don't know how you could say it was anything else. Farming mobs and resource gathering without being stolen from or PKed.....it was an absolute no brainer.

  6. #6
    Banned
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Posts
    264
    Quote Originally Posted by Degamra View Post
    Lolwut?
    I edited my post so you could further understand what I was trying to say, sorry.

  7. #7
    Banned
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Posts
    236
    This idea is like a walmart coming into a small city.

    Many will protest or stand against it -- but its going in anyways.

  8. #8
    let's be honest, the shard is kinda dead right now...

    I wish we could gather all free shards into one... would be so huge 10k players...

  9. #9
    I came to IPY after reading about all the awesome stuff that was promised. Then only about half of it was ever implemented and some of what was implemented wasn't finished. The single most awesome part, to me, was everything around city politics. Having those systems unfinished was a huge disappointment for me. I can't understand why development on this shard has veered off into some other direction when it seems like most ppl came here for what IPY promised it would be. All this Golden Land talk won't bring me back; I couldn't care less for UO:R PvP or anything UO:R as that was why I left OSI!

    This huge 2.5 patch might bring me back... depends on what's actually released... not whats talked about being released. Another popular shard I played a while back has picked up significantly in population while IPY fades. I'm honestly torn between going back there or here. I think 2.5 will make that decision.

  10. #10
    Quote Originally Posted by Dirt View Post
    I just don't see how it will work...You do realize that the people will flock to the side with the higher population, and the other facet will dwindle? Look at Trammel/Felucca situation....I think it would be 10x better if the Golden Lands and it's ruleset was in the Lost Lands of T2A, infact I would embrace it if it were there...

    Wish I could edit the poll -- what do you guys think about The Golden Lands being in the "Lost Lands" of T2A?
    that's not really a whole lot different than what's happening. just a different landmass.

    Quote Originally Posted by Eminem View Post
    This idea is like a walmart coming into a small city.

    Many will protest or stand against it -- but its going in anyways.
    and tons of people go to it.

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •