Page 12 of 14 FirstFirst ... 21011121314 LastLast
Results 111 to 120 of 140

Thread: Rama'taclan's Talon (Super Slayer pic)

  1. #111
    Grand Master GunSixShot's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Location
    Action Packed, GA
    Posts
    2,204
    Quote Originally Posted by Zoidberg View Post
    Are you serious right now snake? How could I not test a FABLED OMGWTFPWNED SUPERSLAYER? I didn't disprove anything, no one will use these on a regular basis.
    The reason I will never bring it out again is the risk is not at all worth the reward. Regardless of the fact that its a weapon its still very rare. If it was as strong as all you think it is, I would use it on a daily basis and defend it to the fullest.

    Also, I used it on a mage not a dexxer, so I'm still unaware of its true power. I'll update you after i test it again.
    Well its basically worthless anyways, since its "Used Condition" now. Might as well chunk it in a trash barrel.
    C'est le Vie. Carpe Diem.
    Aim: UOGJunkie318

  2. #112
    Adept PoleGL1985's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Location
    Minoc
    Posts
    893
    It's Hanes', not mine.

  3. #113
    Administrator Az's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Location
    What's the Canada of UO? Minoc?
    Posts
    4,914
    So I had a bit of an idea:

    What if Super Slayers were blessed, but dropped to your bank account when you died? That way it doesn't become a persistent PvP weapon that you can res and keep using in any situation.

    Perhaps it's not the very best solution possible in the entire UNIVERSE, but it's incredibly simple and it gets to the point of making both sides at least relatively happy.
    Az

  4. #114
    Apprentice
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Posts
    116
    Quote Originally Posted by Az View Post
    So I had a bit of an idea:

    What if Super Slayers were blessed, but dropped to your bank account when you died? That way it doesn't become a persistent PvP weapon that you can res and keep using in any situation.

    Perhaps it's not the very best solution possible in the entire UNIVERSE, but it's incredibly simple and it gets to the point of making both sides at least relatively happy.
    Thats not terrible actually, maybe add in a gold cost also to retrieve it b/c of the amount of magic it takes to pull it from your body and store it in the bank?

    You Naked Kamikaze Fence a dungeon and get "phat lootz" no risk high reward....You die by a pk and lose your gold oh well you didnt lose anything worthwhile...but add the cost to retrieve your weapon back from the bank say 5k-15k each time and you now have a risk.

  5. #115
    Lead Game Master Tilly's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    England
    Posts
    886
    Sounds like a good "middle" idea
    Facta, Non Verba

  6. #116
    Banned
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Posts
    439
    That solution completely ignores the fact that dying while in possession of the weapon doesn't result in a turnover. The weapon should not stay in the hands of a player who is not fit to use it.

  7. #117
    Administrator Az's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Location
    What's the Canada of UO? Minoc?
    Posts
    4,914
    Well, that's more or less what happens when the item gets blessed. We're discussing solutions for making that situation more palatable, because without blessing a super rare item would never leave a bank box or house in Ultima Online.

    People rarely take out Vanqs, for crying out loud. How often would you take out a Super Slayer if there were 9 of them in the entire world?

    I can just announce that we'll never bless them, and that's fine. I've come close to doing that. But any blessing suggestion isn't "not taking into account" that an item doesn't get turned over on death, because that's the fundamental, basic, and essential result of blessing. I was making a suggestion about blessings.
    Az

  8. #118
    Apprentice
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Posts
    116
    Quote Originally Posted by Stencils View Post
    That solution completely ignores the fact that dying while in possession of the weapon doesn't result in a turnover. The weapon should not stay in the hands of a player who is not fit to use it.
    In UO no one will be fit to use it by your standard so they will just be unused sitting as a deco


    Edit: These people who are "unfit" to use said weapon are the same people who would need a weapon like this to farm for gold to become "fit".

  9. #119
    Banned
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Posts
    1,758
    I think that the idea of rewarding someone who kills someone with that particular item is more beneficial.

    Just like on OSI, where item insurance was in place, and the person who killed the other play was rewarded a particular amount of gold.

    In this case, you could make it so that whoever kills the person with the super slayer receives X amount of gold which is withdrawn from the other players bank, and if the person who has the super slayer doesn't have the gold to cover that payment, the item simply becomes lootable.

    This resolves a few issues:

    #1 - Someone is rewarded for actually killing that person

    #2 - It might prevent someone from wanting to instantly res, in chances of getting res killed, if the insurance payment is high enough.

    They should also lose X amount of gold even if they die to a monster.

  10. #120
    Administrator Az's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Location
    What's the Canada of UO? Minoc?
    Posts
    4,914
    The main problem with that, azria, is this:

    WTFBBQ ITEM INSURANCE ON IPY LOOLOLOLOL!!!!!!!111
    Az

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •