View Full Version : Stackable Potions
Fleeg
December 19th, 2011, 06:12 AM
Any chance of making pots stackable? or at least only in your backpack?
I think they have this on osi right now.
opinions?
EDIT: Freight, you're a ****ing genius!
50 of each pot would totally make poison and macing stam drains obsolete.
Let them be stackable but still count against item limit
Problem solved
xiiiri
December 19th, 2011, 06:38 AM
This has been brought up before... and god I wish it was a reality. +1.
Corrado
December 19th, 2011, 06:45 AM
It sounds great in theory. But I'd have to vote no.
As it is, item count limits people to carrying only a certain amount if they want to be able to loot people as well. We don't need people running around with stacks of 20, 30, 50 ea pot on them.
Gaukr Stengard
December 19th, 2011, 07:37 AM
They did this on UO:Gamers Hybrid and it is a good concept,I vote yes.
iSlayr
December 19th, 2011, 08:16 AM
It sounds great in theory. But I'd have to vote no.
As it is, item count limits people to carrying only a certain amount if they want to be able to loot people as well. We don't need people running around with stacks of 20, 30, 50 ea pot on them.
good point never thought of that. undecided
Xiled
December 19th, 2011, 01:25 PM
yeah kind of undecided on this myself.
50 of each pot would totally make poison and macing stam drains obsolete.
Abbot
December 19th, 2011, 01:51 PM
It sounds great in theory. But I'd have to vote no.
As it is, item count limits people to carrying only a certain amount if they want to be able to loot people as well. We don't need people running around with stacks of 20, 30, 50 ea pot on them.
Good let them roll around with 3 kegs of pots on em, more potions for me. Vote yes!
Freight Elevator
December 19th, 2011, 02:20 PM
Let them be stackable but still count against item limit
Problem solved
Xiled
December 19th, 2011, 02:23 PM
Let them be stackable but still count against item limit
Problem solved
Ding ding ding, we have a winner!
DeeDs
December 19th, 2011, 02:43 PM
Let them be stackable but still count against item limit
Problem solved
YES!
reb
December 19th, 2011, 03:55 PM
yus
K Fed
December 19th, 2011, 07:43 PM
Whats the point if they still count towards the item limit?
Can't you just organize agent them into a pouch
Freight Elevator
December 19th, 2011, 07:54 PM
The point is its annoying as ****
Xutag
December 19th, 2011, 08:02 PM
Let them stack, keep a 1 item count for each stack (helps in houses), but make the weight add per bottle in a stack. Think will keep the number carried down, while making it a lot easier on all of us.
Eazy
December 19th, 2011, 08:09 PM
Even if it didn't count against the item limit, empty bottles weigh 1 stone per bottle stacked so i assume the same rule would apply to filled pots stacked.
WHATSGOODDELUXE
December 19th, 2011, 08:20 PM
The point is its annoying as ****
im not sure if u said the F or the S word, but i agree either way.
The Mind Sculptor
December 20th, 2011, 06:38 AM
What freight said. No reason not to implement this. The coding has already been done!!!!
JenSlade
December 20th, 2011, 09:25 AM
deffinently make re suiting easier...but a stack of 20 pots has to count for 20 items, not really that big of a deal though once you setup an organize mac and hotkey
Wyrm'gard
December 20th, 2011, 03:54 PM
Yes! Just be sure that either item count or weight count is leveraged to keep them in check.
DeeDs
December 20th, 2011, 11:25 PM
Actually I wanna change my opinion after reading the new posts, make it add up to weight limit and not item count :) and YES bring it asap please!
PoleGL1985
April 9th, 2012, 11:41 PM
An Corp
Snake
April 10th, 2012, 01:48 AM
they have this it is called a keg
Powered by vBulletin® Version 4.2.1 Copyright © 2013 vBulletin Solutions, Inc. All rights reserved.