OSI style guild system

[Kleus]

Currently, without sharing the GM's account, you can not have a guild setup where multiple leaders are running and administrating a guild. It's been stated that sharing accounts is not allowed on IPY, so I'd like to propose we use the new guild system that OSI has currently.

all the details can be found here (http://uo.stratics.com/php-bin/show_content.php?content=31066).

As they have it, it doesn't tie guilds to houses. Anyone with 25k gold can make a guild. It also has an internal 'rank' structure that allows certain guild functions. The one I'm after is being able to allow people to add and remove guild members. Please bring this in! Thanks!

[Ele]

I support this.

[Anthius Disius]

I'd support having emmisaries and warlords as it would help keep guilds running during a leave of absence of the GM. But the rest is all garbage. You should definitely have to have a guild stone,, and the declaring war and alliance stuff is all bull ****. Alliances are gay and the whole menu is annoying. The declaring war system is also a pain in the ass. Outside of the emmissary and warlord position the current production shard system is just a bunch of bull****.

[Kleus]

Whatever, I don't care about alliances and stuff. I just need multiple people to help run a guild.

[buckthorne]

Multiple people who can administrate the guild is amazingly helpful. I vote yes!